Page Updated January 1, 2026

New Jersey Man Awarded $37 Million in Mesothelioma Lawsuit Against Johnson & Johnson

Page Reviewed and Edited by

Mesothelioma Attorney Paul Danziger

Over the course of the last fifty years, mesothelioma victims have been awarded significant amounts by juries hearing of asbestos companies’ negligence and wrongdoing, but few have garnered the amount of attention that the verdicts against consumer giant Johnson & Johnson have. One notable example involves the case of a 46-year-old man, Stephen Lanzo, who was diagnosed with the rare form of cancer after three decades of using the company’s iconic baby powder product and their “Shower to Shower” powder. A New Jersey jury awarded Mr. Lanzo $30 million in compensatory damages related to his asbestos-related disease, and also ordered the company to provide Mr. Lanzo’s wife with $7 million.

Mesothelioma Risk Posed by Popular Talc-Based Powders

Though most American consumers are only familiar with malignant mesothelioma from television advertising, Mr. Lanzo’s case appeared in national headlines, in large part due to the popularity of the products accused of causing his illness. Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder has long been one of America’s most trusted and recognizable brands, and the notion that using it could lead to a fatal form of cancer shocked people’s sensibilities.

Making the issue even more alarming, the sick man’s attorneys presented evidence to the jury that Johnson & Johnson had been aware of the mesothelioma risk posed by asbestos in their product, and that instead of taking action to protect consumers, the company worked to suppress the information.

Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Lead to J&J Pulling Talc-Based Products

Mr. Lanzo’s mesothelioma lawsuit was decided in 2018, and since then there have been tens of thousands of claims filed against Johnson & Johnson accusing the company of negligently causing both mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. The company has settled some of these cases, won some, and lost some.

Though they continue to defend themselves against mesothelioma claims, the company has also made the notable decision to stop selling talc-based powder products in North America.

The Lanzo verdict underscores the significant legal and financial consequences companies face when failing to warn consumers about known asbestos risks. By awarding both compensatory damages to Mr. Lanzo and additional damages to his wife, the jury emphasized the personal and familial impact of mesothelioma. Cases like this have helped shape public awareness and corporate accountability, illustrating how decades-long exposure to talc-based products can lead to serious health consequences and the importance of pursuing legal recourse for asbestos-related illnesses.

The Lanzo verdict became a pivotal reference point in talc-related mesothelioma litigation by demonstrating that consumer product exposure, not just industrial work, could support substantial jury awards. By crediting evidence that Johnson & Johnson knew of asbestos contamination risks and failed to warn users, the case helped establish a roadmap for later plaintiffs pursuing similar claims. It also contributed to increased regulatory scrutiny, widespread public awareness, and the company’s eventual withdrawal of talc-based powders from key markets. For mesothelioma victims, the decision reinforced that long-term daily use of household products can create legally actionable asbestos exposure and that juries are willing to hold even the largest corporations accountable.