West Virginia College Responds to Asbestos Lung Cancer Lawsuit

Donna Spurling filed a negligence lawsuit against West Virginia’s Fairmont State University after being diagnosed with lung cancer she blamed on asbestos exposure suffered on the school property. Several months later, the school submitted a response defending itself. The academic institution asserted that sovereign immunity protects it from personal injury lawsuits involving insurance claims due to its status as a state entity. At the same time, it attempted to shift responsibility to other parties who might have been responsible for the woman’s asbestos exposure, including West Virginia state authorities.

fairmont

School’s Inconsistent Response Noted by Asbestos Lung Cancer Victim’s Representative

The asbestos lung cancer litigation took a new turn on January 9th when the school submitted what lawyers call a notice of non-parties wholly or partially at fault. This is a type of legal document that attempts to shift the blame to entities beyond the named defendants that could be responsible for the plaintiff’s condition. The school’s notice of non-parties identifies 143 separate organizations whose products Ms. Spurling might have encountered through occupational exposure or when she served with the U.S. military, including broad references to different types of equipment or insulation that may have been present in those locations.

The attorneys representing Ms. Spurling responded to the filing by highlighting how contradictory the school’s position was: At the same time that the university argued that it had a protected government status and pointed to state authorities as bearing responsibility for her asbestos-related illness, they also submitted a voluminous, comprehensive list of other potentially responsible parties.

University Seeks State Protection Against Asbestos Cáncer de pulmón Liability While Also Blaming State

Asbestos exposure cases often involve complex liability questions, and Fairmont State University’s filing specifically references a 1986 legal action that resulted in West Virginia’s state government setting aside $20 million for asbestos cleanup at government-owned properties. The university argues that all parties and non-parties connected to that earlier case bear full or partial responsibility for the asbestos contamination that remained at the facility and allegedly caused Ms. Spurling’s disease.

Abogado especializado en mesotelioma analiza opciones de compensación con Meso-Book

Paquete de compensación financiera GRATUITO

  • Información sobre despachos de abogados que recuperarán su INDEMNIZACIÓN MÁS ALTA
  • Aprenda cómo cobrar en 90 días
  • Solicite su parte de $30 mil millones en fondos fiduciarios
Pablo Danziger

Pablo Danziger

Revisor y editor

Paul Danziger creció en Houston, Texas, y se licenció en Derecho en la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Northwestern en Chicago. Durante más de 25 años, se ha dedicado a representar a víctimas de mesotelioma y a otras personas afectadas por la exposición al asbesto. Paul y su bufete han representado a miles de personas diagnosticadas con mesotelioma, asbestosis y cáncer de pulmón, obteniendo indemnizaciones significativas para los clientes lesionados. Cada cliente es fundamental para Paul y atenderá todas las llamadas de quienes deseen hablar con él. Paul y su bufete se encargan de casos de mesotelioma en todo Estados Unidos.

Conéctese con el abogado especializado en mesotelioma Paul Danziger