Inspector’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos-Contaminated Boilers
Calling their argument “unpersuasive,” a judge hearing a personal injury lawsuit filed by the widow of a mesothelioma victim denied an asbestos company’s motion to have the case dismissed and allowed the case to move forward for a jury to decide.
Family Blames Asbestos Dust from Boiler Maintenance for Man’s Mesothelioma
After hearing pleadings from both sides, Judge Manuel J. Mendez of the New York City Asbestos Litigation court agreed that there was more than sufficient evidence to suggest that Thomas L. Eckrich’s malignant mesothelioma may have been caused by his exposure to ECR International’s Utica-brand boilers.
The mesothelioma victim had been a pollution control engineer for the city of New York’s Department of Air Resource between 1970 and 1995. Over his 25-year tenure, much of his job responsibility involved being present during the maintenance and replacement of asbestos-containing boilers. He died in 2019, and his family filed suit against the manufacturer of those boilers, claiming that he had been sickened by asbestos dust that he inhaled when that work was being done.
Company’s Own Representative’s Testimony Aligned with Mesothelioma Victim
Though ECR argued that their Utica-brand boilers could not have caused Eckrich’s mesothelioma because they had not contained asbestos, testimony from their own representative contradicted their assertion. Relying upon the New York state rules surrounding evidence and criteria for dismissing cases, Judge Mendez noted that when Mr. Eckrich’s product identification was combined with testimony from ECR’s corporate representative that asbestos-containing insulation was used in Utica Boilers still in service at the time Mr. Eckrich was exposed to them, it was more than enough to deny the motion for summary judgment and allow the case to go to a jury.
Further, the judge noted that ECR’s assertion that the mesothelioma victim had never been exposed to boilers and insulation that they had manufactured, sold, or distributed, “unpersuasive.”
Paquete de compensación financiera GRATUITO
- Información sobre despachos de abogados que recuperarán su INDEMNIZACIÓN MÁS ALTA
- Aprenda cómo cobrar en 90 días
- Solicite su parte de $30 mil millones en fondos fiduciarios
